Mindless Bureacracy Over Common Sense |
|
| WILLIAM WILSON sets out the case for Lyth Arts Centre in the wake of the Scottish Arts Council’s decision to withdraw funding from the Caithness venue THE SCOTTISH Arts Council (SAC) has today announced that as from April 2009 it will cease to fund Lyth Arts Centre, the only dedicated professional arts venue in Caithness. The Council has funded the Centre on an annual basis since it first opened in 1977. For many years it was one of the Council’s Core Funded Organisations. In 2006 the Council re-organised its methods of funding, awarding core-funded status to a small selection of what is regarded as key strategic organisations and reclassifying the others, including all of the Scottish theatre companies and many venues as Flexibly Funded Organisations. Lyth Arts Centre received Flexible Funding which is awarded (and has to be re-applied for) every two years. Lyth’s Flexible Funding application for 2009–2011 was one of 106 eligible applications which requested a total of £14,677,011 across the country. But, with only £6,980,000 to distribute, the Council has given awards to only 63 applicants and Lyth’s application has been turned down. This news has come as a total surprise as we had the impression that SAC was keen to continue to support Lyth. Although we received a 30% funding cut when we switched over to Flexible Funding and, as a result, lost a newly-created Director’s post, during the last two years SAC has provided extra project funding to support an enhanced programme of music events and workshops which was favorably received during its first year and was awarded further funding for the current year. For some time SAC has suggested that it would have preferred Lyth to be funded by the local authority but had continued to offer its support as Highland Council was never in a position to provide more than a few thousand pounds each year and as SAC acknowledged the contribution Lyth made to the Caithness community. The Centre’s Executive Committee will meet shortly to discuss our options for the way ahead and, at this stage it’s unclear what course of action we will take. SAC has provided a thirteen-page assessment with reasons for its decision. The first part of this document prepared by the relevant SAC lead officer commends the Centre for its good work and has only some criticism regarding the comparatively small scale of the management structure. The officer ends her report by stating that “If awarded, I would recommend that the grant should be increased by £6K for both 2009/10 and 2010/11 to include additional project funding. This recommendation is made on the basis of Lyth’s impact as an arts centre (punching above its weight given its small size), its fit with our criteria for flexibly funded organisations and its geographic location”. |
|
|
However, the application was then passed to another panel of Specialist Advisors who came up with the following statement: |
|
|
Yes, we are a group of people trying to keep the organisation going on a voluntary basis but only because SAC slashed the funding for a paid post so it can’t have it both ways. One could deduce from this that it’s Caithness which is being turned down, not Lyth. As far as I know, none of the Specialist Advisors has ever been to the Centre or, if so, not in recent years. Like many decisions made in the Central Belt, there is no recognition that just about every second outfit in Caithness is run by a group of people working on a voluntary basis. Links |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 Jun 2009 | |
15 Jun 2009 | |
08 Jun 2009 |
|
THIS MONTH'S EDITORIAL |
|
July 2009 Editorial |
Bookmark with:
What are these?