GC: How has this project compared to other public works that you have undertaken?
DW: It has been demanding in terms of the timescale. To devise, develop and deliver two different projects from scratch, three months full time (50% work in the community and 50% creating a new piece of work) is demanding, quite tough at times. Finding a way of talking about spirituality and dealing with the theme has been interesting as well. The work I have done previously has been large public commissions so by their nature they have to be strong and durable, a lot of the work I have been making over the last couple of years has been quite physical.
GC: So has this been more of an interior process on various levels for you?
DW: It has been a very interior process in terms of developing the work and in terms of developing the community side, in a way that was relevant to people and gave people an in road to get a handle on the project and start to explore it physically rather than start by asking the bigger questions which can scare a lot of people off!
I needed to find a way of gently and visually exploring that and then exploring the theme more broadly. The installation piece that I’m making is quite introspective and I hope it will encourage the people who experience it to be introspective. The piece is reflective and experiential, not just something you look at but a new experience, so you can go inside it and experience it both inside and out.
That experience of inside and outside is definitely an element to this and possibly a lot of my other work. I wanted to use the weather to talk about spirituality. I wanted to bring the weather inside the church, but also enable people to go inside the piece, so you have almost a kind of Russian doll effect.
This was deliberate, connecting us to a macrocosmic and microcosmic element and exploring our place within that. This is the first time I have used projection in my work. The images I’m using are satellite images that come from outside beamed back inside the church and then we are able to go inside the piece as well and experience it individually as an internal journey too.
GC: Interesting that you chose the weather as an element in the work – in Scotland it’s something we all talk about endlessly, but we are less likely to openly discuss the bigger questions day to day. It’s an interesting way in.
DW: That’s exactly why I chose it. The aspect of interconnection, that we are part of nature, part of a bigger global picture. I chose the weather because it’s universal, we can all relate to it, it is usually the first port of call when we meet someone, it’s something we all experience, it is all about us on an everyday level.
GC: And we don’t have control over it either.
DW: We try to predict it which is an interesting prospect, a very human need to predict and control things – that link between the everyday world and another world or another level of ourselves.
GC: How have people responded to the idea of spirituality during the project?
DW: On the whole very positively. A lot of people have picked it up and really gone with it and have started to explore their own relationship to spirituality or their own religion, so I think that it has touched quite a lot of people in a way that I wasn’t expecting.
GC: Has the baseline been religion or has it been individual responses to ideas of faith or spirituality?
DW: Spirituality. Some people have contextualised the project within their own faith or religion but for most people it seems to have been expansive, looking at wider issues of spirituality. In the context of Inverness I think the churches have been very brave in asking people to come and do this, holding a mirror up to themselves to some degree and looking at spirituality in ways they may not have thought about previously.
It is a brave, very relevant and valid thing for them to do. I think they are all aware of dwindling congregations. By approaching the church from a cultural angle it can perhaps open that door a little bit more. |
Bookmark with:
What are these?